Search for: "Ohio v. EPA"
Results 61 - 80
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2010, 6:10 am
Municipality immune from award of punitive damages by administrative law judgeCollins v Village of Lynchburg, Ohio, Decisions of the Administrative Review Board ARB No. 07-079, ALJ No. 2006-SDW-3The U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court, on April 29, 2014, reversed the DC Circuit in EPA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:24 pm
EPA of Hillsborough County, Florida and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am
VAP- Ohio's brownfield cleanup program); Ohio EPA confirms the property meets VAP cleanup standards by issuing a covenant-not-to-sue; Ohio EPA sends certification to Tax Commissioner that the property has been cleaned up under the VAP; Tax Commissioner issues a order granting an exemption from the increase in value of the property post VAP cleanup. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 3:06 pm
Supreme Court in Sackett v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
EPA followed through on this commitment on February 20, 2025 (see EC-439 to EC-441). [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 4:48 am
Hile v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
Gen. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:54 pm
In Boaz v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Photo: Ohio Non-Point Source Management Plan [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
For example, in Ohio, R.C. 3734.20 provides some authority to Ohio EPA to seek cleanup of hazardous waste. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
The EPA appealed to the Ohio Court of Appeals. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
The EPA appealed to the Ohio Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court in landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:26 am
The following Environmental Defense v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:21 pm
Canton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:42 am
Heritage Found. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Back in July of last year, in the case of Hobart Corp. v. [read post]