Search for: "Oliver v. Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874-1932 2 v. (1942) Holmes, Oliver Wendell; Pollock, Frederick; Howe, Mark De Wolfe (Editor). [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
Dice Corp    Eastern District of Michigan at Bay CityCOPYRIGHTSOLOMON OLIVER, JR., District Judge. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Jon L. Gelman
(C) - Yes Evans, Elease (V) - Yes Dancer, Ronald S. - Yes DeAngelo, Wayne P. - Yes Doherty, Michael J. - Yes Oliver, Sheila Y. - Yes Quijano, Annette - Yes Scalera, Frederick - Yes Webber, Jay - Yes Session Voting: Asm. 5/21/2009 - 3RDG FINAL PASSAGE - Yes {76} No {0} Not Voting {4} Abstains {0} - Roll Call Addiego, Dawn Marie - Yes Albano, Nelson T. - Yes Amodeo, John F. - Yes Angelini, Mary Pat - Yes Barnes, Peter J., III - Yes Biondi, Peter J. - Yes Bramnick, Jon M. - Yes… [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:28 am by Rory Little
Justice Thomas began his dissent with this 1897 “quip” from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, but then immediately recalled the thought, saying that “old rules often stand the test of time because wisdom underlies them. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 8:03 pm
The pairs he examines are: 1) John Marshall (M/P) and Thomas Jefferson (IPW) 2) John Marshall Harlan (M/P) and Oliver Wendell Holmes (IPW) 3) Hugo Black (M/P) and Melvin William Douglas (IPW) 4) William Rehnquist (M/P) and Antonin Scalia (IPW) Of these, the only ideologically pure warrior to have influenced constitutional law in the long run, according to Rosen, is Holmes, and only because he moderated his judicial philosophy in the 1920s. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Andres
Harmon, pp.226-229 Gene Cartels: Biotech Patents in The Age of Free Trade, By Luigi Palombi, Reviewed by David Koepsell, pp.230-231 Reputation, Celebrity and Defamation Law, By David Rolph, Reviewed by Lawrence McNamara, pp.232-235 Law, Mind And Brain, By Michael Freeman and Oliver R Goodenough (eds), Reviewed by Dennis Patterson, pp.236-241 [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 7:30 am
Publisher's description:Thurgood Marshall became a living icon of civil rights when he argued Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm by Smita Ghosh
” In the same publication, Attorney Alyson Clair Decker reviews You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Enrico Bonadio, Protecting Art in the Street (Dokument Press 2020)Jane Ginsburg, Deep Dive: Burrow-Giles Lithographing v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
Scalia and Thomas have a clear and large-scale vision for constitutional law, in which (for example) affirmative action is abolished, Roe v. [read post]