Search for: "P. v. Stark"
Results 61 - 80
of 442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2020, 12:38 pm
Stark in Xcoal Energy & Resources v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
Stark in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 3:11 pm
Chavakula v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:50 pm
Stark in United Access Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Kinney v. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 5:47 am
Stark in Belcher Pharmaceutical, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
Broadcom (in support of neither party) and in Thryv v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 1:01 pm
Stark in Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
Stark in Peeble Tide LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
Stark in Cirba Inc. d/b/a Densify) et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
Stark in Cirba Inc. d/b/a Densify) et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
As Scalia noted in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Morrison (2000) and United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
Cir. 1993), and RembrandtVision Technologies, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm
Without alleging any fraud by any of the defendants, the Honorable Judge P. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Chief among these are Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statue which require a hospital apply a Fair Market Value (FMV) standard when valuing physician practices and establishing physician compensation [20]. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Chief among these are Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statue which require a hospital apply a Fair Market Value (FMV) standard when valuing physician practices and establishing physician compensation [20]. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Jenna comes to her healthcare lawyer, seeking advice on the business structure and whether it runs afoul of corporate practice of medicine, anti-kickback and fee-splitting, Stark or PORA, HIPAA, or any other healthcare legal rules. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]