Search for: "P. v. Stevens" Results 61 - 80 of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2023, 4:33 pm by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
This editorial by Steven Hill (Democracy SOS) reflects on the implications of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Pico Neighborhood Association v City of Santa Monica–the the first California Voting Rights Act case to reach the state’s Supreme… Continue reading The post “A new and better California Voting Rights Act” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:44 pm by Rick Hasen
If Justice Stevens saw fit to tie Bush v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:33 pm by Paul Kirgis
Sotomayor did not participate in Stolt-Nielsen, which produced a 5-3 majority with Ginsburg, Breyer, and the now-retired Justice Stevens in [...] [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
First, on page 2 footnote 2 of Justice Stevens' dissent (p. 124 of the .pdf), he cites the George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal! [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:41 am
From today's Conlaw reading: Adarand Constructors v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:37 am by WSLL
THE STATE OF WYOMING; STEVEN EDWARD DOBBINS v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[P]rivity, or a relationship approaching privity, exists between the personal representative of the estate planning attorney” (Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309 [2010]). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Chris M. asks: What were the most controversial decisions Justice Stevens was involved in? [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:34 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Stevens, No. 5:05-CV-33-BO(1) Decision and Order (Mar. 17, 2008), aff'd Order (E.D.N.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm by Scott W Lawrence
Carr, 97 Wn.2d 436, 439, 645 P.2d 1098 (1982); State v. [read post]