Search for: "PETERSON V US" Results 61 - 80 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am by Alden Abbott
A well-crafted and much more detailed normative exploration of ideal state antitrust enforcement is found in a recently released Pelican Institute policy brief by Ted Bolema and Eric Peterson. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Another was filed by attorney Dan Peterson, representing Law Enforcement Groups and State and Local Firearms Rights Groups (Law Enforcement Brief), while a third was filed by the Crime Prevention Research Center, led by John R. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
Smith & Dan Peterson, Big Data Comes for Textualism: The Use and Abuse of Corpus Linguistics in Second Amendment Litigation (forthcoming Drake L. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Donahue has posted to SSRN her history-laden amicus curiae brief in FBI v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post on the recent CJEU decision in the case of Peterson v Google LLC C-682/18 and C-683/18 – a copyright case which deals with the protections given hosting platforms by the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Courts, however, have declined to extend the doctrine to hotel proprietors (Peterson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:20 pm by Christine Corcos
Peterson, Independent, have published Big Data Comes for Textualism: The Use and Abuse of Corpus Linguistics in Second Amendment Litigation. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:20 pm
Peterson, Independent, have published Big Data Comes for Textualism: The Use and Abuse of Corpus Linguistics in Second Amendment Litigation. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Peterson v Simopoulos [2021] VCC 1080 – a defamation case in the County Court of Victoria. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
As Todd David Peterson has written, the “contention that there are historical precedents for the use of Congress’s inherent contempt power against officials who assert the President’s claim of executive privilege is incorrect. [read post]