Search for: "Pennsylvania Video Operators v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
By itself, off-label promotion is no more causal than, as we commented the other day, a “video of a company employee kicking his dog. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason P. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason P. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/JCz7fo (@ComplexD) The Rear View Mirror on Google+: 5 Top Stories From Last Week’s Unfiltered Orange Newsletter - http://bit.ly/LHFdro (@OrangeLT) Western District of Pennsylvania – Electronic Discovery Special Masters Program – http://1.usa.gov/LIgSBN (EDSM) Sight and Sound 20 Questions about Information Governance in 40 Minutes - http://bit.ly/LD48Rr (Barclay Blair) Blast From The Past: 2011 Intermountain eDiscovery Conference… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
In a Term in which the Court was not considering the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Texas’s redistricting plans, and Arizona’s controversial efforts to regulate immigration, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Conspirators in various locations throughout the United States (identity brokers) solicited customers. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Conspirators in various locations throughout the United States (identity brokers) solicited customers. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
” At Concurring Opinions, Daniel Solove discusses United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
(Patently-O) District Court E D Pennsylvania: References to patents in website’s “terms of use” and online product manuals do not constitute false marking: Hollander v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am
” In United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
As Wikipedia explains, since 1961 the United States has used the exclusionary rule to enforce the protections of the 4th Amendment. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
NY has an internet fraud unit, and Florida has a cybercrime subunit. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 am
The case involves a defense objection under Batson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:17 am
(see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
