Search for: "People v Mitch"
Results 61 - 80
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
If what you are telling me is correct, people will be going to prison. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
White House press secretary Jen Psaki affirmed President Biden’s commitment to codifying Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:41 am
I really enjoyed The People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
Even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has recognized that “[t]he mob was fed lies” and “[t]hey were provoked by the [former] president and other powerful people. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
Hundreds of people participated in what Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell condemned as a “failed insurrection” and, as Bobby Chesney described on the National Security Law Podcast, the events included a “cartoonish avalanche of crimes. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
JULY saw a huge Twitter hack of many prominent people. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
.'" Brief for Petitioner 64 (quoting Morrison v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Not content with those spoils, Mitch McConnell and the GOP-controlled Senate have played hardball to gain still further advantage. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Writing in dissent in Comptroller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:31 am
Montana Eighth Judicial District and Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) doubled down on his plan for a quick confirmation of Barrett in a radio interview on Friday. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 2:49 pm
On the fortieth anniversary of the Roe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Article V of the Constitution, also unchanged by the Civil War amendments, makes formal constitutional change rare and unlikely. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
