Search for: "People v. Bender" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2016, 7:59 am by Gene Killian
With that background, consider the New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent decision in Templo Fuente de Vida Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Three people who had ties to the organizations were later convicted of federal crimes. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
For understanding virtue and the ethics of technology, we can look to a Christianity emphasizing universal love and reconciliation for all people, of all types (including race, gender, sexual orientation). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Liebman.New Providence, NJ : LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 2011. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm by Michael Ehline
The vehicle would have a seating capacity of five people, including one pilot, and would use electric power. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 7:41 am by Andrei Mincov
Recently I wrote a 100-page comparative research paper on the treatment of parody in the copyright laws of common law countries and selected European countries. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]