Search for: "People v. Blake"
Results 61 - 80
of 291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 pm
(Brady v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:36 am
Blake resisted and was tased, without apparent effect. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 11:20 am
Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815, 818 (1988); Atkins v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Arizona (2002)), a finding in a state system of mandatory sentencing guidelines that increase the top of the range beyond that authorized by the crime alone (Blakely v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:49 am
Fine twice challenged the statute at the New York Court of Appeals (People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001] and People v Daniels, 5 NY3d 738 [2005]), and at the Second Circuit (Brown v Greiner, 409 F3d 523 (2d Cir 2003]). [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
See Anglemyer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:01 am
” BLAKELY ESTATE v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
" Crucial to the determination as to whether an individual satisfies the constitutional “residency” requirement, said the court, is that the individual manifests an intent [to reside there], coupled with physical presence without any aura of sham [see People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am
California (U.S. 2007), and Justice Breyer repeatedly relied on my Yale piece in his dissent in Blakely v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:48 pm
" [George Sutherland, Euclid v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 8:59 pm
Some Blake. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:22 am
About the author: Ted Brooks' noteworthy trial experience includes People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
Lacking the mad skillz of Yale law students to know with absolute certainty that the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court means “people will die,” it seemed prudent to consider what Judge Kavanaugh had actually said or written in the past rather than to assume he would reverse Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 12:00 pm
Robert Blake (with M. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 8:45 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
