Search for: "People v. Cherry"
Results 61 - 80
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:35 am
So for anyone whether you the only shortcut you may know is Ctrl C and Ctrl V. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 1:45 am
Frank Petro has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
Some people think of this as a sign of courage; others as an unwarranted smugness. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
They know there is accountability; people are being heard. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:37 pm
(People often say that "fundamental rights are reviewed with strict scrutiny. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
Digital pirates leverage anonymity, geography and extradition treaties to wrap themselves in the laws they cherry pick and use as loophole-driven alibis. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:06 pm
Some people like Shakespeare, others like Dashell Hammett. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Pascale v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Pascale v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
The House of Commons exists because the people have elected its members. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
As the judge commented, “spying on a journalist would be to investigate the people with whom the journalist is in contact. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Advocates of any position, however wrong-headed, can always cherry-pick some facts that they could use to buttress their arguments. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
This is a live blog of the reclaiming motion (appeal) hearing in the challenge brought by Joanna Cherry QC MP and others for judicial review of the Government’s ability to prorogue the UK Parliament. [read post]
