Search for: "People v. Green (1983)"
Results 61 - 80
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Nieves v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
" This quote is unnerving to people who believe that our constitutions were designed to protect property owners, not property takers.Dissent at 23 (citing Green Bay Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
They therefore made no recommendation in respect of this class of prisoner.The recommendations put forward for remand prisoners were implemented in the Representation of the People Act 2000.4 The Act did not make provision for the enfranchisement of convicted prisoners, who remain disenfranchised under s3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, as amended.It is clear that successive governments have held the view that prisoners convicted of serious crimes which have… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Green New Deal. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
Superior Court (1983) 147 Cal. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
Superior Court (1983) 147 Cal. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
Green J cites it as saying the following: “172. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:27 am
The very basic background to this issue is that in the 2005 decision of Hirst (No. 2), the European Court held that Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which prevents prisoners from voting, is in breach of the electoral right under Article 1 of Protocol 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:29 am
Smith-Green Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:25 am
Squash Ireland Ltd. [1983] ILRM 363). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:25 am
Squash Ireland Ltd. [1983] ILRM 363). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Collins.But all that said, innocent people getting framed by the cops, innocent people getting convicted and sentenced to die, innocent people getting executed, those are the eggs broken for the omelet. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am
Seven people have been hospitalized. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
Melevsky v. [read post]
