Search for: "People v. Harris (1984)"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
"Well thank you Harry. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
Harris, 13-817, and KBR, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
Five to eight people were walking away from the area in various directions in a field between buildings and other people were standing closer to the buildings. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am
Adopted in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
Howren, 312 N.C. 454 (1984), there is no equal protection violation when the same group of people (here, 16-year-olds alleged to have committed a Class H felony) are treated differently at different times (here, before and after the effective date of the Juvenile Justice Reinvestment Act). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
16 May 2025, 12:53 pm
, Best v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
, 457 So.2d 1388, 1390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
96-1040. -- October 21, 1998 Considered by HARRIS, P.J., and LARSON, LAVORATO, NEUMAN, and ANDREASEN,JJ. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus, Justice Kagan’s dissent for herself and three others, quoting from the 1984 Arizona v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
Harris County, 529 U.S. 576, 586-87 (2000). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Harris. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
Presumably that's why the city saw fit to contract out the menial task to a private mom-and-pop operation, rather than using its own workers, not to mention officials.Tooke v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
