Search for: "People v. Jones (1996)" Results 61 - 80 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2012, 2:00 am by Rachit Buch
For example, will the serious harm test be more onerous than the current need for a tort to be real and substantial, as set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, or the “threshold of seriousness” considered in Cook v Telegraph [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
Jones in 1996 the Court of Appeal said a notice with a saving clause but no actual expiry date would be valid (a ‘no date’ notice). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am by Shea Denning
App. 1996) (upholding lawfulness of search carried out pursuant to school policy authorizing random searches of students in high school classrooms with hand-held metal detector wands; a gun was discovered in the student’s coat); People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
State, 267 Ga. 41, 42, 472 S.E.2d 683, 685 (1996) (“[A] conflict of interest would arise if a defense attorney were to ‘switch sides’ and prosecute his former client. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
  This is a one clause bill to repeal section 13 of the Defamation Act 1996. [read post]