Search for: "People v. Kay" Results 61 - 80 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
the decisions in Qazi, Kay and Doherty. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Judgment of the Court of Appeal The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Lord Neuberger MR (with whom Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ agreed). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by Tammy Binford
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:04 am by J
After her death, it transpired that Mrs YB had made two further wills, leaving the flat to other people. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
– Der Israel/Palästina Konflikt als Beispiel Peter Häberle, Das neue Grundgesetz Ungarns (2012) – Keine ›kosmopolitische‹ Verfassung Kay Hailbronner, Gerechtigkeit bei der Aufnahme von Flüchtlingen im Europäischen Asylsystem Lauri Hannikainen, To Be a Member of an International Human Rights Organ – What Is it Like? [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
” [John Kenneth Ross, “Short Circuit” on Freed v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:16 am by Fiona de Londras
The recent judgments in Kay v United Kingdom (ECHR, 21 September 2010) and Manchester City Council v Pinnock (UK Supreme Court, 3 November 2010), and the implications which they have for Irish housing authorities under the ECHR Act 2003 will be discussed in detail. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]