Search for: "People v. Little (1983)" Results 61 - 80 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm by MBettman
Testa,  2017-0854, is about more than the value of bobbleheads (some of us would say that is little, but collectors may disagree). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:37 am by Christine Hurt
  And I think she means as hard and as long as the person who did not get that spot in 1983. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Orin Kerr
My point was to emphasize just how little oversight there is when it comes to these raids, how few protections are afforded to potentially innocent people on the receiving end of them, and how when things go wrong the victims of mistaken raids have little recourse, and the cops who wrongly raided them face little accountability. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
The new wording in s.8 of the 2022 Act was inserted into the main piece of legislation, as s.114A Representation of the People Act 1983, which sets out the activities that fall within the offence. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
It would be appropriate to note that the first federal opinion to do so was in 1983, by Judge Grady of the Northern District of Illinois, in Ulane v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:08 am by Rosalind English
Moore v British Waterways Board [2012] EWHC 182 (Ch) – read judgment From time to time, the courts are called upon to explain who holds the power to order people about, and why they have it. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am by Joanna Schwartz
Second, qualified immunity doctrine may discourage some people from bringing cases when their constitutional rights are violated. [read post]