Search for: "People v. Martin (1989)"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
7 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Collin & National Socialist Party v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Moreover, Americans were good evangelists, attempting to spread that faith when, especially after 1989, many American professors were asked to “consult” with new groups of would-be “framers” in a variety of countries. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
See Martin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
Soon Gustav gathered a group of men from Dalarna, who in Västerås fought all the Danes to flee, and asked archbishop Gustav to not use his troops against his own people but instead against the enemies of the church; but he did not listen and became the enemy of the prince; was banished and sent to Denmark. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Med. 997 (1989); Troyen A. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Travis v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale… [read post]
