Search for: "People v. Martin (1989)"
Results 61 - 80
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
See Martin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
Soon Gustav gathered a group of men from Dalarna, who in Västerås fought all the Danes to flee, and asked archbishop Gustav to not use his troops against his own people but instead against the enemies of the church; but he did not listen and became the enemy of the prince; was banished and sent to Denmark. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Med. 997 (1989); Troyen A. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Travis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm
It is the state and profundity of that emotion, perhaps more than the calculus of rational governance, that propels a people to statehood, and statehood to take its particular form. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Monagan (1988, pp. 170), Sheldon Novick (1989, pp. 522), Liva Baker (1991, pp. 783), G. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
Rev. 719 (1989), and cases cited therein. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
One Hour Martinizing Dry Cleaning, 180 F. [read post]
