Search for: "People v. Merrick" Results 61 - 80 of 267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What is most interesting about Fraley’s data, I think, is its demonstration that at least some people somewhere are always talking about court-packing. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13]  As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
“I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am by CMS
On 10 November 2021, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, and unanimously dismissed Lloyd’s representative action brought against Google. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
For example, 130 people (out of 1.2-1.5 million) opted into the price-fixing case against JJB Sports concerning replica football shirts.[13] Likewise, barely 10,000 out of about 100,000 of Morrison’s employees joined the group action against the supermarket chain for unlawful disclosure of private data on the internet by another employee.[14] Furthermore, s.47C (2) of the Competition Act obviates the need for individual assessment of damages, but limits the requirement to prove… [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Attorney General Merrick Garland noted it was a “victory” for pregnant people in the state and for “the rule of law. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
For several weeks now, a constitutional conflict has been simmering on Capitol Hill. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 8:17 am by Tom Smith
But he also authored the landmark opinion Bostock v. [read post]