Search for: "People v. Novel" Results 61 - 80 of 1,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC v Brown  2021 NY Slip Op 06167  Decided on November 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department is a novel defense to a claim of deceit. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
It seems to be social network week here at TechnoLlama.There have been some interesting developments in the ongoing case ConnectU v Facebook (not to be confused with Facebook v ConnectU). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by INFORRM
In Haaretz.com et al v Mitchell Goldhar (SCC case no. 37202), the Supreme Court of Canada is asked to decide whether the court in Ontario has jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim arising from an article widely published in Israel, but read online by a number of people in Canada. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am by Robert Black
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:32 am
The brief, submitted in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Lisa Stam
A good example is the Eagle v Morgan et al. case (for a commentary on the piece, see my recent blog post here). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, Aldous Huxley used Henry Ford's name as a deity-like reference in his 1931 novel Brave New World. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am by Frank Cranmer
They were Baptists, and since moving to Oryol in 2005 they had regularly invited people to their home for prayer and Bible reading [1-5]. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York Court of Appeals takes up that issue, holding that when identification is an issue in a criminal case and the identifying witness and defendant appear to be of different races, a party is entitled to a charge on the risks inherent in cross-racial identification.The case is People v. [read post]