Search for: "People v. Pub. Serv. Co." Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
” Englert added that while preparing for the event, he was surprised to realize that West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
From early in the 20th century it has been commonplace to understand that the corporation and its fiduciaries owe their highest duty of loyalty to equity holders, and that this duty requires the operation of the enterprise to maximize the value of their holdings.[9] This principle of shareholder primacy continues to serve as the central principal of the legal management of corporate governance. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The state is constituted by the union of people and government, and it is the state that claims against all other states the twin rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. . . . [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
On August 15, 2016, the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) identified raw scallops served at Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai as a likely source of an ongoing hepatitis A outbreak. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  I think we’ve made progress in helping people understand their rights. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
He sees government regulation as a solution to some of these concerns, and views IP rights as potentially serving a social end beyond encouraging creativity: encouraging us to pay for that creativity in direct and visible rather than indirect ways. [13] Here, too, IP is serving as a form of regulation, one that in Pessach’s view trades off against other forms of regulation.The potential loss of privacy that accompanies the free flow of information on the Internet… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]