Search for: "People v. Reese"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:31 am
The Two Sides of the Minimum Wage Debate: Friedman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information Law Reese v Daines, 20 Misc 3d 1145(A) Justice NeMoyer’s ruling in the Reese case provides summaries of the basic issues and case law involved in satisfying the mandates of New York’s Open Meetings Law (OML) (Public Officers Law § 100 et seq) and its Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), Public Officers Law Section 84 et. seq. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
At the Washington Post blog “She the People,” Diana Reese is skeptical of the announcement, countering that the move “hardly turns the insurance giant[s] into Santa Claus. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:06 pm
In Reese v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Then Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Reese (?) [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:20 am
Lambert along with another man, Bruce Reese, as being in cahoots with him in robbing the bar. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:18 am
The case is Wetzel v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
Reese suggests the claim could be pushed further. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
On June 22, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in three cases addressing the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act: People v King, No. 142850, People v Kolanek, No. 142695, People v Kolanek, No. 142712. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Reese, 627 F.3d 792, 801–02 (10th Cir.2010) (applying intermediate scrutiny to review of § 922(g)(8)); United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center, 513 N.E.2d 387, 393 (Ill. 1987). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Basketball superstars Jordan v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Pleasantville with Reese Witherspoon. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Reese (Houston, TX)SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
