Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
Unfortunately, though, that is what happened to our client in People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:47 pm
But I'd nonetheless have probably come out the same way.I can see why the jury might want to slink out the back door and not talk to anyone after rendering their verdict. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 4:54 pm
Some people have problems. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:01 am
The issues presented by L.T.H. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:45 pm
In the analogous case of People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:43 pm
Silence as Evidence of Juror Rehabilitation The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
The facts of Torres -- rendered by the Court of Appeal a couple years ago -- are incredibly to those in the present case. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:31 am
At least not for purposes of filing a habeas corpus petition.The case is The Nonhuman Rights Project v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
In McRoberts v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:27 am
The victim met the defendant through a Craigslist advertisement for sex, and defendant said in his ads that he'd meet people at their hotel room and provide a "session" for them for $140 (which is how the police picked him up). [read post]
Supreme Court Decision Allows Broader Exclusion of Jurors, But May Further Isolate the Death Penalty
15 Jun 2007, 3:31 am
But by expanding the class of people who cannot serve on capital juries, the decision may ultimately render the death penalty invalid as juries fail to represent the true diversity of the American public.The U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
When the Supreme Court rendered their 5-4 ruling on June 26, 2015 in the same-sex marriage case Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
If free speech is for people, and corporations aren't people, then is there an element of hypocrisy in supporting a lawsuit by a corporation asserting its right to use its wealth and power with respect to a contentious political issue? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
There's not much of a constituency for the select group of people who kill someone and then burn down their house. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Took 'em all of nine minutes to walk back to the deliberation room, get all the jurors to sit down, have a brief chat, get back up, walk back to the courtroom, get everyone (the judge, attorneys, parties, etc.) together, and render the exact same verdict. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
See State v. [read post]
