Search for: "People v. Sawyer" Results 61 - 80 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Keith Sawyer, psychology, Washington U, The Western cultural model of creativity: Its influence on intellectual property law Studies creativity in groups. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am by Aaron Tang
Second, the Court decided in Sawyer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:09 am by Alex Joel
Jackson said in his famous concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Lemley presented no evidence that others were working on this inventive contribution prior to, or simultaneously, with Edison or Edison's people. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
London Borough of Islington v Boyle & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1450This rather sad case was Islington’s appeal on the issue of whether Ms Boyle was occupying the flat she had under a secure tenancy as her ‘sole or principal home’. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
London Borough of Islington v Boyle & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1450This rather sad case was Islington’s appeal on the issue of whether Ms Boyle was occupying the flat she had under a secure tenancy as her ‘sole or principal home’. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly held, on its own initiative, that the respondent could overcome his procedural default under Sawyer v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by Brock Meeks
During her 11-year term in the AG's office, she argued before the United States Supreme Court on behalf of 35 states in State Oil v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by David Bernstein
Merely pointing out that states don’t always follow one’s policy preferences is hardly a strong argument against federalism. (2) Professor Logan Sawyer of the University of Georgia Law School coincidentally has an excellent piece out on SSRN about the origins of Court’s holding in Hammer v. [read post]