Search for: "People v. Self (1998)" Results 61 - 80 of 476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2007, 5:06 am
Supp.2d 174, 175 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
So any power exercised under the N&P Clause cannot be self-standing. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:45 am by David Post
Last week, our friends at Cato Institute, joined by a self-styled “Basket of Deplorable People,” submitted a truly wonderful amicus brief supporting Tam’s challenge. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is one of those celebrity cases that only arise in the Second Circuit, home of New York City, where famous people live and work and play and bring lawsuits against other famous people.The case is Oakley v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 6:27 am by Jennifer Davis
Native Hawaiians, Kānaka Maoli, were a self-governing, sovereign people until July 1898 when the United States annexed the Kingdom of Hawai’i. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 9:15 am by Russell Knight
The people that know you best are also the people that can hurt you the most. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
FN3 Between 1998 and 2008, Alice and Michael Kimble met with UBS representatives in New York at least six times to discuss the account. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In it, Tracey Meares revisits her 1998 article about constitutional criminal procedure, which argued that "a body of doctrine designed to ensure racial equality in law enforcement has now become an impediment to minority communities’ attempts to liberate themselves from rampant crime” and cautioned against “self defeating discretion skepticism. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm by MBettman
  Teaford argued it is self-evident from the nature of the resale exemption, which does not immunize property from taxation, but only defers it to tax the final consumer. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
However, the more we've thought about it, the more we're convinced that the proper response to this (we fervently hope) aberration has to be more than just self-righteous criticism.In one way or another, we've helped convince supreme courts in six states either to adopt or to reaffirm the learned intermediary rule. [read post]