Search for: "People v. Smith (1976)"
Results 61 - 80
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
Smith, 370 F. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
People disregard adequate warnings all the time.So we fight the heeding presumption whenever it comes up. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
The issue came up often in the 1970s, before Smith v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
regardless of whether tech was known in 1976. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
The petitioner was convicted of killing three people, including one who was raped before being killed. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
The police were confronted with an emergency situation in which there was an immediate need for their assistance for the protection of life, the search was not motivated by an intent to arrest and seize evidence, and there was a reasonable basis, approximating probable cause, to associate the emergency with the area to be searched (see People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173 [1976], cert denied 426 US 953 [1976]; People v Desmarat, 38 AD3d 913, 914-915… [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am
Smith’s pick from Louisiana, Dale Cox, is quoted as saying “[i] think we need to kill more people. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
It May Confuse People And It May Be A Crime. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Georgia, 428 U.S. 96 S.Ct. 2909. 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976); State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
” And in his column for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps eulogizes Al Smith, the respondent in Employment Division v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm
(People v Wilhelm, 34 AD3d 40, 45–50 [3d Dept 2006].) [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
Currently before the Ninth Circuit is an appeal in the case of Fyock v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This post is from the Reed Smith (and now we should add Cozen) side of the blog only, as Dechert is involved in the litigation to be discussed.You’ll have to forgive us – we’re weird that way – but we found the opinion in Carter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Summers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
