Search for: "People v. Williams (1976)" Results 61 - 80 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Steve Lombardi
Williams 1999 2001 Chuck Yagla 1975 1976 Bill Zadick 1996 Jim Zalesky 1982 1983 1984 Think you’re tough enough to an Iowa Wrestler? [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am by Scott Bomboy
“Plaintiffs rely heavily on the plurality opinion of Justice [William] Brennan in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Rev. 121, 158 (1992) (overwarning subjects users to “the perplexing and unpleasant prospect of a regime of warnings that are sometimes incomplete and sometimes too complete”); William H. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
5 May 2008, 10:36 am
The late Justice William Brennan used to tell me: "I can't believe that the leader of the free world is going to keep on executing people. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 8:51 am by paola Aurucci
The Supreme Court ruled in Province of North Cotabato v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Wade is overturned: “Imagine that every state were free to choose whether to allow Black people and white people to marry. [read post]