Search for: "Peters v. Woods"
Results 61 - 80
of 227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
CG v Facebook Ireland [2016] NICA 54 – see our case comment from Lorna Woods. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:56 am
He is at the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council for Landmark Ltd and Woods Development Ltd v American International Bank (in receivership), a case about an unpaid electricity bill which has wafted in from Antigua and Barbuda. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
Adams, when the labored arguments of Paterson and Peters, of Iredell, Addison and Chase, are no longer remembered. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Microsoft v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
” At the Daily Beast, Peter Beinart argues that the President should nominate a mother, such as Judge Diane Wood, to the Supreme Court; because few female Cabinet members and other high-level government officials have children, he contends that such a nomination “would send the message that women can have kids and still reach the apex of their profession. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Speaking of metadata: Jane gave us an update on recent action in the Klayman v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
Mellon and Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
Wood, Forbes) [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
” Peter Baker at the New York Times discusses the possible retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am
As one footnote, note that the pivotal "research exemption" case of Madey v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:42 pm
(As she notes, this is related to Peter Lee's argument that the Federal Circuit adopts formalistic rules to limit the extent to which generalist judges must grapple with complex technologies.) [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Flegg v Hallett ([2015] QSC 167 [pdf]) Peter Lyons J in the Supreme Court of Queensland awarded general damages of Aus$275,000 and special damages of Aus$500,000 to a former Queensland minister. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
On 14 October 2015, HHJ Graham Wood QC gave judgment in the case of Elliott v Staffordshire Police dismissing a slander claim arising out of comments made in a child protection conference. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
Quite right, said the CFI, dismissing Intervideo's appeal - CFI decision in Case T-105/06 Intervideo v OHIM, (IPKat)EPO adds EPC post-grant data to PRS database (EPO), EU Patent Jurisdiction: Details of New Proposals From Portuguese EU Presidency (Blog@IPR::JUR), (IAM), Teva invalidates acid metabolite patents for terfenedine, (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Merrell Pharmaceuticals Inc, Aventis and Sepracor [2007] EWHC 2276 (Ch) ), (IPKat), Nice summary of… [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:14 pm
See Gallegos v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Emma Svoboda outlined the issues at hand in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 pm
Martino v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:53 am
First Amendment jurisprudence including New York Times v. [read post]
