Search for: "Polston"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
” The lone dissent by Justice Polston posited that the term “pregnancy” should not be read into FCRA as it was not explicitly included in the statute. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 8:40 am
” By contrast, Justices Canady and Polston would have rejected the access to courts challenge on the basis that in 1968, when the constitutional access to courts provision was adopted, the remedies available to a claimant for benefits were lower than even those permitted under the 104 week limitation of section 440.15(2)(a). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm
Justices Canady and Polston dissented based on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:02 am
Donald Padilla National Securities Corporation Kestra Investment Services, LLC Thomas Polston Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated Advest, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
The Dissenting Opinion Justice Polston dissented in which Justice Canady concurred. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm
In order to explain the problem, Justice Polston, writes an opinion in which Justice Canady concurs. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Justice Canady’s dissent, joined by Chief Justice Polston, states that “Sosa marked a sea change in Florida’s law governing class actions,” and that the two dissenters would recede from it. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:14 pm
For most of the past 21 months, the overwhelming majority of the controversial decisions of the court have been a 4-3 vote, with conservative Lawson joining the side of Justices Charles Canady and Ricky Polston. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:38 am
Justice Polston wrote a dissenting opinion in which he stated that the Court did not have jurisdiction to review the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:02 am
Chief Justice Quince and Justice Canady were recused and Justice Polston wrote a dissent. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:37 pm
In an opinion authored by Justice Polston, a five-member majority of the supreme court quashed the appeals court’s decision and disapproved the decision of the 5th District in Jiminez. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In fact, the Court opined that it would not have much effect on the admissibility of expert opinion in Florida state courts.[5] As Justice Polston has explained, the “grave constitutional concerns” raised by those who oppose the amendments to the Code appear unfounded . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In fact, the Court opined that it would not have much effect on the admissibility of expert opinion in Florida state courts.[5] As Justice Polston has explained, the “grave constitutional concerns” raised by those who oppose the amendments to the Code appear unfounded . . . [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:36 am
Chief Justice Canady wrote a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justice Quince and Justice Polston. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:27 pm
We note, however, that in order to be entitled to compensation for any loss of profits, the commercial fishermen must prove all of the elements of their causes of action, including damages.Justice Polston concurred in part and dissented in part. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:33 am
And a dissent by Judges Canady and Polston argued that the “minor impact” of the judge’s rounding-up policy on Cromartie’s sentence was not fundamental error. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 9:28 am
Answering the certified question in the affirmative, Florida Supreme Court Justice Polston, writing for the court, applied the plain meaning approach to the interpretation of the insurance contract. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In fact, the Court opined that it would not have much effect on the admissibility of expert opinion in Florida state courts.[5] As Justice Polston has explained, the “grave constitutional concerns” raised by those who oppose the amendments to the Code appear unfounded . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In fact, the Court opined that it would not have much effect on the admissibility of expert opinion in Florida state courts.[5] As Justice Polston has explained, the “grave constitutional concerns” raised by those who oppose the amendments to the Code appear unfounded . . . [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:42 am
Crist oral argument on the 5th DCA JNC dispute, where the great bow-tied one, Sandy D'Alemberte, delivers a classic and tangles (intellectually) with Justices Pariente, Polston, Canady and Quince. [read post]
