Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 5,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part with the majority. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
The great Chief Justice explained why courts must defer to Congress's powers; he was not aggrandizing the powers of the Court to rewrite the Constitution. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm by Adam Levitin
It's here to stay in its current form and powers absent Congressional action. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
" Thomas gave a speech to the Eleventh Circuit Judicial Conference that was so full of anger, false narratives, and whining that it is tragically perfect for the age of Trump. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm by Francis Pileggi
The plaintiffs have adequately pleaded that Director Thomas McInerney may have such a relationship with IAC. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
Brand X,  the majority opinion by Justice Thomas applies Chevron deference, even though the agency’s position had flip-flopped. 2013. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Voting RightsThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]