Search for: "Price v. Planning Board"
Results 61 - 80
of 969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 4:16 am
First Company Adopts "Proxy Access Reimbursement" Bylaw Yesterday, HealthSouth announced that its board plans to adopt a by-law amendment relating to shareholder nominations for directors that would reimburse activist shareholders, subject to certain conditions, where the candidate gets at least 40% of the votes cast. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Sep 21, 2023 | HHS Selects Drugs for Medicare Price Negotiation | Biden Administration introduces price regulation to the pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:16 am
Judge Baer’s opinion cites the Eighth Circuit’s 2008 opinion in Elam v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 6:02 am
EklecCo NewCo LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:20 am
EklecCo NewCo LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:41 am
Lawrenceville Stakeholders v City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2021 WL 836777 (PA Cmwlth 3/5/2021) [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 7:35 pm
This is especially true with full-ratchet anti-dilution protection because the issuance of even 1 share at a price lower than a series of preferred stock will result in an adjustment of the conversion price of all shares of that series of preferred stock. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm
A 2011 Ontario Municipal Board decision was upheld by the Divisional Court in Rosen v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:59 am
The court ordered that the plan be rescinded after concluding that the company board was unable to show that the plan was fair, particularly in light of Musk's control over Tesla (Tornetta v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:25 am
The companies’ boards approved the deal, as did AOL’s shareholders. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
And, to avoid the trap of price over quality of provider and suitability of coverage for the company. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
In the end, he determined that the Rights Plan was subject to the enhanced scrutiny test under Unocal Corporation v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:15 pm
As we learned in Dodge Bros. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
They will find any tariff certified by the Board at any price to be unacceptable if it is “mandatory” in any sense. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:12 pm
Employers should similarly plan ahead when intending to engage in hard bargaining, as the employer’s actions in doing so may be reviewed by the Board. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Who prepared the plan? [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
See also the author’s e-book on Board Composition, and oodles of additional resources in our “Director Recruitment/Board Succession Planning,” “CEO Succession,” and “Board Composition” Practice Areas. [read post]
