Search for: "Provost v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
Miller Distinguished Professor of Higher Education, as well as a former interim provost, at the University of Georgia. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:33 am
Spay v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:57 am
The central university (‘the provost’) will support the new dean or be skeptical about the initiatives. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:30 am
Consider, for example, university provosts and their equivalents (in universities without an office of the provost, the officer to whom the law dean reports). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
Management-oriented professionals and provosts look at these problems and ask: what’s the value proposition for new lawyers? [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
In today’s case (Provost v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:54 pm
In his famous dissent from Abrams v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am
” With these words in his concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:37 am
Nor could a reasonable jury conclude that the provost’s stated nondiscriminatory reason for issuing the terminal contract was pretextual. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am
Ever since the SJC issuedFabre v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am
Ever since the SJC issued Fabre v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am
Ever since the SJC issued Fabre v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:07 pm
From two Nov. 30 opinions in Wilkerson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:05 am
Regmund v. [read post]
