Search for: "Public Citizen v. US Trade Representative"
Results 61 - 80
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
The expression "public morals" does not appear in the US Constitution; the justification for the regulation of many matters that relate to public morals in the US would have to be found in competences defined in other terms in the US Constitution and the relevant case law. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm
to use some other basis like CVAP. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
Documents used in contempt proceedings, and settlement agreements considered by courts, are subject to public access. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 11:12 am
Brief History For over 100 years, Colorado recognized the need to protect its citizens from deceptive trade practices through a mechanism akin to the Federal Trade Commission Act that preceded it. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:46 pm
Public officials are subject to a much higher standard than average citizens. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
Reed, in which the Court will consider whether the names of those who sign a political petition can be made public. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:52 am
Many non-citizens in the U.S. are here on “non-immigrant visas. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:07 am
American University v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In the complaint, Plaintiff alleged that it is the exclusive owner of the name, likeness, voice, right of publicity and endorsement, worldwide trademarks, copyrights, and other intellectual property including but not limited to visual and aural depictions, artifacts, memorabilia, and life-story rights, and/or trade dress of the late movie star James Dean. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:52 pm
Under the current libel standards set by the case of The NY Times v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
And then it was the PPIP… the Public Private Investment Partnership… until that too, died on the vine. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
For publication opinions today (5): In John Clark, Rep. of the Estate of Cory R. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
The basis of the objection is wide enough to include public interest grounds. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court in Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:06 am
In rejecting this argument, the Court cited to a prior BioTE case, Forget About It, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:33 am
Represented by the Institute of Justice (IJ), Cato challenges the SEC’s use of gag orders to prevent parties to settlements from questioning or criticizing the agency. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
