Search for: "Reach v. NEVADA ADMINISTRATORS" Results 61 - 80 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2012, 3:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Ill.), filed on August 21, 2012 by KV against the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services challenging the latter’s formal prior authorization policy favoring compounded HPC formulations over Makena® (parties reached settlement); and (4) K-V Pharmaceutical Company v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  Perhaps one or more of the possible outcome-determinative “swing” states (e.g., Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) would omit his name, although even that is highly speculative, as it would depend upon questions of state-law authority and who controls the executive and judicial branches of the particular state. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Heidi Henson
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
 Right now we’ll concern ourselves with classic “strict liability” – that is the Restatement variety – rather than implied warranty (unless there’s no other relevant authority), which is another way that some plaintiffs attempt to reach an essentially identically result. [read post]
The Healthy Elections Project aims to assist election officials and the public as the nation confronts the challenges that the coronavirus pandemic poses for election administration. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm by David Cole
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM As a candidate, Trump promised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
  Exemption for Agricultural Activities Presently, 16 states have some sort of exemption for “farm” or “agricultural” labor from workers’ compensation coverage.[1]  The historic reasons for the exemption are couched in administrative ease and economics – that it would be particularly difficult for a small farming operation to maintain the necessary records, insurance and accounting to properly comply with the workers’ compensation system,… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm by John Ellis
The case in which Judge Mazzant invalidated the Department of Labor’s new minimum salary Rule is State of Nevada, et al. v. [read post]