Search for: "Reed v. Secretary of State"
Results 61 - 80
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
The Secretary of State certified the referendum earlier this month. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Wilson, with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Carnwath agreed; a concurring judgment was given by Lord Carnwath with whom Lord Reed and Lord Hughes agreed; a concurring judgment was also given by Lord Hodge with whom Lord Hughes agreed. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
The FtT stated that the burden of proof in immigration appeals is on the appellant and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
Ms Romein’s claim was however rejected by the Secretary of State on the basis that her birth had not been registered at a consulate within a year of her birth. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
Michael Silverleaf QC also made submissions on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm
But we haven’t seen a complaint this juicy since Allgood v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:11 am
Caplan, Arbitrator Challenges at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Loretta Malintoppi & Andrea Carlevaris, Challenges of Arbitrators, Lessons from the ICC Gregory J. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
However, the current Secretary of State, Sam Reed, considers them to be public records, and thus open for public inspection under state public records law. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:51 am
Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption and Reed each gave a separate dissenting judgment. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm
" Reed's Will (Or. 1906). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
Michael v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:27 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Al-Jedda, heard 27 June 2013. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
