Search for: "Rex v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 10:39 am
LACBA’s State Appellate Judicial Evaluation Committee(SAJEC) is vetting three potential appointees to the Second District Court of Appeal: Rex Heinke, Hon. [read post]
19 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In Tyler v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
I do not believe that the standard of care required of a medical practitioner has been more clearly or succinctly stated than by Lord Hewart C.J. in Rex v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
Texas, two individuals and 18 states are once again asking the Supreme Court to do what it refused to do eight years ago in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:13 am
Stein v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:15 pm
See, of course, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm
Insurance Corporation, [40] The strict grammatical rule of construction whereby the restrictive clause is limited to modifying the immediate antecedent may give way when the context requires a deviation from the rule: Rex v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm
Fisher noted that Lanier had been branded as deceptive by the second highest court in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals, in Christopher v. [read post]
