Search for: "Reyna v. United States District Court" Results 61 - 80 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Finally, a commercialoffer for sale made by a foreign entity that isdirected to a United States customer at its place of businessin the United States may serve as an invalidingactivity. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
(collectively, “CLS”) by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia holding that certain claims of Alice’s U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Gene Quinn
Despite the turmoil surround software patent eligibility I believe with great certainty that software will remain patent eligible in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm by Jason Rantanen
Section 1292(c) states that "The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction— (2) of an appeal from a judgment in a civil action for patent infringement which would otherwise be appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and is final except for an accounting." [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:38 am by Gene Quinn
It simply stated: Upon consideration en banc, a majority of the court affirms the district court’s holding that the asserted method and computer-readable media claims are not directed to eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Media Weather in which Baron Services won a reversal by a 2-1 vote:Baron Services, Inc., (“Baron”) appeals the orders of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama awarding summary judgment of noninfringe- ment and attorney’s fees to Media Weather Innovations, LLC (“MWI”). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:14 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent Nos. 5,715,314, 5,909,492, and 7,272,639. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am by Dennis Crouch
For his conclusion, Judge Reyna relies heavily on 2009 decision by Judge Rader where he sat by designation as a district court judge in Cornell Univ. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm by Eric Guttag
Related posts: Bio/Pharma Amici Brief Filed in Marine Polymer Reexam AppealOn September 26, 2011, the a three-judge-panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
Ex Parte Schmieding (12:01 Tuesday) A new model for patent and trademark depository libraries (Director’s Forum) Patent backlog hinders nation’s job creation (PatentlyBIOtech) US patent counts, 2010 (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) 2011 patent reexamination filings continue uptrend (Patents Post-Grant) Avoiding a stay pending patent reexamination: Osmose v Arch Chemicals; Richtek v uPI Semiconductor (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:05 am by Arocho Law Office
Reyna has been nominated to fill the open slot on the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
Reyna to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]