Search for: "Richard C Davis"
Results 61 - 80
of 397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2021, 7:05 am
• C. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Fleming, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, on Wednesday, January 6, 2021 Tags: Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, Liability standards, Section 16(b), Securities enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, U.S. federal courts Rethinking Corporate Prosecutions Posted by John C. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:31 am
• Robert C. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:05 pm
Richard C. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Putting aside what the “right to vote” the Court has discussed in the context of the Fourteenth Amendment may mean, the voting rights covered by the Twenty-Sixth Amendment (and by the earlier specific voting rights amendments—the Fifteenth, Nineteenth, and Twenty-Fourth—which served as intellectual and textual templates for the Twenty-Sixth) involve not an absolute right to vote, but a right to be treated equally with respect to the vote.That is why Representative… [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:18 pm
JUDGES Richard E. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
Ogden, 9 Wheat., Marshall, C. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am
Richard Burr Dumped Stock, So Did His Brother-in-Law. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:42 am
., on Saturday, April 18, 2020 Tags: Boards of Directors, COVID-19, Delaware law, DGCL, Securities regulation, Shareholder meetings, Virtual meetings Going Private Transactions Posted by Warren S. de Wied, Philip Richter, and Robert C. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Frase, Richard S. and Julian V. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Beyer’s article Reactions to Discretionary Trusts: An Update by Richard C. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:27 am
Daniel Davis, a senior fellow at Defense Priorities. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
First, Judge Richard Seeborg cited and applied Rule 702, a statute, and not dicta from case law that predates the most recent statutory version of the rule. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
All the relevant facts and circumstances must be taken into account in determining whether there is real commercial exploitation of the mark, including: (a) whether such use is viewed as warranted in the economic sector concerned to maintain or create a share in the market for the goods and services in question; (b) the nature of the goods or services; (c) the characteristics of the market concerned; (d) the scale and frequency of use of the mark; (e) whether the mark is used for the… [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 5:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2020)I am delighted to post for comment a draft essay that I have recently finished (or or less). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:15 am
Elle follows her ex, Warner Huntington III (played by Matthew Davis), to Harvard law school after he breaks up with her on the night when she expects him to propose. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 6:10 am
Herlihy, Richard K. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
The California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975, as amended by the Davis Administration in 2003 to provide for interest arbitration in first contract negotiations, was viewed as a dream statute from the perspective of collective bargaining proponents, seen particularly through the lens of the inadequacy of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Trump Hotel Mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms Politico – Anita Kumar | Published: 10/2/2019 House investigators are looking into an allegation that groups, including at least one foreign government, tried to ingratiate themselves to President Trump by booking rooms at his hotels but never staying in them. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 04123-19 Philips v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03262-19 Bromley v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08073-18 A woman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 11 Victims of sexual assault (2018), No breach- after investigation 03816-19 Hayden v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2018),… [read post]
