Search for: "Richard Samp"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
Keisler, Sidley Austin LLP Patricia Ann Millett, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Richard A. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
Precisely how this will play out in different areas of the law and with different kinds of claims will (as Richard Samp discusses here) remains to be seen. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:12 am
Judge Richard Leon of U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
” In an op-ed in Forbes, Richard Samp weighs in on Jennings v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; at the Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp argues that the court should rectify the CFPB’s “end-run around Article II limitations on the President’s authority to appoint federal officers without the Senate’s approval. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am
At The Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp discusses Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am
At the Legal Pulse, Richard Samp reads the tea leaves and guesses that “Chief Justice Roberts assigned the Brown decision to himself, and is writing a decision striking down California’s restrictions on violent video games. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:47 am
” At the WLF Legal Pulse, Richard Samp weighs in on the issue of jurisdiction in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
” At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp discusses the prospect that the Court could limit lawsuits under the Alien Tort Statute through its decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, although “both parties quickly claimed victory, in reality the decision is likely to satisfy no one and to raise as many questions as it answers”; Richard Samp, who at the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse concludes… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:49 am
Richard Samp – One particularly important important aspect of the Wal-Mart decision was its holding that Rule 23 entitles a class-action defendant to “individualized determinations” regarding individualized issues of fact. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
’” At The WLF Legal Pulse, Richard Samp writes that the argument “made clear that state and local governments are playing Whack-a-Mole with private property rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp argues that “Justice Kagan’s vitriolic dissent last Friday in Knick was far wide of the mark when it lambasted the Court’s decision to overrule the oft-criticized Williamson County Planning v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” At The WLF Legal Pulse, Richard Samp posits that in China Agritech v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:45 am
When asked about the choice of topics by Richard Samp of the Washington Legal Foundation, Gorsuch said he felt constrained by the code of judicial conduct not to discuss anything controversial. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 3:39 am
Yesterday, I joined former judges Susan Braden, Janice Rogers Brown, Randall Rader, and Thomas Vanaskie in an amicus brief (written by experienced appellate lawyer Richard Samp) urging the D.C. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
” Writing for the Legal Pulse of the Washington Legal Foundation, Richard Samp sees the case as “serv[ing] notice that it [the Supreme Court] is watching DOJ legal filings for potential inconsistencies on preemption issues. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
Congratulations to Richard Samp, Harriet Hageman, and Mark Chenoweth of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, who represent plaintiff. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp has observations on the Court’s decision last week in Holder v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 2:57 pm
In Cerame v. [read post]
