Search for: "Rosner v Rosner" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It follows that "[the] selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice" (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738; see Dimond v Kazmierczuk & McGrath, 15 AD3d 526, 527). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, she failed to establish that she had a potentially meritorious cause of action (see generally Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738; Allen v Potruch, 282 AD2d 484, 484-485; Iannacone v Weidman, 273 AD2d 275, 276-277; Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In addition, summary judgment dismissing all of the causes of action and cross claims for contribution must be awarded to the Hager defendants because HDW settled the legal malpractice claim, and the remaining grounds for seeking contribution, as set forth in the pleadings, are no longer viable (see Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 736; Crimi v Black, 219 AD2d 610, 611). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
  [2] JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley [3] Testimony of Josh Rosner to the House Oversight Committee, reprinted on roubini.com (Accessed April 16, 2011) (http://www.roubini.com/financemarkets-monitor/260754/dodd_frank_is_a_farce_on_too_big_to_fail) [4] PL 111-203 § 202(c)(2) [5] Id at § 204(d) [6] Id at § 1101(a)(6) [7] Craig P Aubuchon and David C. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The "selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice" (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]), and plaintiff acknowledges that further inquiry by Nihamin would have been futile. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am by Schachtman
 constitutional cases, such as Brown v. [read post]