Search for: "Roy v State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 7:02 am
Green v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
The parties initially settled their dispute for $15,000; but when the alleged infringement continued, Allen sued the State of North Carolina and various state officials (including Governor Roy Cooper) in federal court. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:28 am
In Marlow v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked counsel Roy Englert on Monday at the Supreme Court, in a re-enactment of the 1948 Supreme Court case Goesaert v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:21 pm
The patented technology, which was invented by Professor Roy G. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:56 am
Given the evidence presented, the jury was completely right in saying that the State did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:23 am
Professor Roy Adams on MPAO v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Groves v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:35 pm
Circuit has affirmed the order dismissing the case of Pants Judge v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
Facts: This case, (United States of America v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Riley, The History of Native American Lands and the Supreme CourtMarjorie Heins, "Priests of our Democracy": The Origins of First Amendment Academic Freedom Deborah Ann Roy, The 1963 Good Friday Parade in Birmingham, Alabama: Walker v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:42 am
Facts: This negligence case (Jakeem Roy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 5:10 pm
See Fulton v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 12:44 pm
The appellants' brief states that 'Dr. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Groves v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 11:06 am
I know I do.Justice Rubin starts today's opinion with:"May the second-place bidder on a public works contract state a cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage against the winning bidder if the winner was only able to obtain lowest bidder status by illegally paying its workers less than the prevailing wage? [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In Moore v. [read post]
