Search for: "Russo v. Tran*" Results 61 - 80 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
I hope the following links, excerpts, comments, and reflections (in no particular order) will prove of interest for one reason or another to our readers. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Russo, Mayer Brown LLP, on Wednesday, June 19, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Compliance & ethics, Conflicts of interest, Fiduciary duties, Investor protection, Regulation Best Interest, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation Delaware’s New Competition Posted by William J. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action “exists where a party to a contract receives bills or invoices and does not protest within a reasonable time” (Russo v Heller, 80 AD3d 531, 532 (1st Dept 2011] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]), or where partial payment has been made (see Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Waters, 13 AD3d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Magid was a significant step forward from prior appellate law on the subject of deadlock under Section 63, the most recent of which, Seligson v Russo, 16 AD3d 253 [1st Dept 2005], involved true “50-50 deadlock. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:17 pm
On the one hand, it conflates with the “China Dream of national rejuvenation”[12] with its transnational implications that it is explained, will see “China moving closer to center stage and making greater contributions to mankind. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by William Ford
Robert Chesney dissected the most important disputes in Doe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
On the one hand, it conflates with the “China Dream of national rejuvenation”[13] with its transnational implications that it is explained, will see “China moving closer to center stage and making greater contributions to mankind. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
His discussion of Utah's trade secret statute, and the availability of unjust enrichment damages, comprises only part of his opinion for the 10th Circuit in Russo v. [read post]