Search for: "S M v R B"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
On this issue, R (Mani) v the London Borough of Lambeth [2003] EWCA Civ 836 amounted to a reformulation of the test in Westminster v NASS. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
S., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
S., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
On this issue, R (Mani) v the London Borough of Lambeth [2003] EWCA Civ 836 amounted to a reformulation of the test in Westminster v NASS. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 10:46 am
(Oakdale), Jesse B. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
Mais dès que le titulaire vend le produit de son invention, il est réputé avoir bénéficié des droits découlant du monopole limité. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:14 pm
Read the decision at: R. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:52 am
Arbelius V Unum Group D/B/A Unum Life Insurance Company of America, the plaintiff Kristina M. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeal was asked to consider the case on the basis that: a) SO was an asylum seeker, rather than a failed asylum seeker b) SO was now 20, rather than 23 as thr AIT had found - the AIT's decision not being conclusive (R(A) v Croydon LBC: R(M) v Lambeth LBC [2009] 1 WLR 2557 ) c) The Court was to ignore the fact that SO was receiving education and training as set out in his pathway plan. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeal was asked to consider the case on the basis that: a) SO was an asylum seeker, rather than a failed asylum seeker b) SO was now 20, rather than 23 as thr AIT had found - the AIT's decision not being conclusive (R(A) v Croydon LBC: R(M) v Lambeth LBC [2009] 1 WLR 2557 ) c) The Court was to ignore the fact that SO was receiving education and training as set out in his pathway plan. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The City laid off M rather than another worker, R. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:01 am
.'s motion for a protective order requiring Petitioner Andrew R. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 1:47 pm
Jesús M. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am
M. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
Then Student B (plus Student B's friends) start up again, and Student B corners Student V in the bathroom, telling Student V he should not have gotten Student B in trouble. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
The Court of Appeal decision in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex parte O, R v Leicester City Council, Ex parte Bhikha [2000] 1 WLR 2539 held that if an applicant's need for care and attention is to any material extent made more acute by some circumstance other than the mere lack of accommodation and funds, then . . . he qualifies. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:30 pm
B. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:18 am
L'Art 53 b) CBE exclut de la brevetabilité les procédés essentiellement biologiques d'obtention de végétaux. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:29 am
Edward M. [read post]
