Search for: "S. T. v. B. F. (NOW S.), ET AL." Results 61 - 80 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) from putting its new claims and continuation rules into effect (SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm by Orin Kerr
See LaFave, et. al. 2 Criminal Procedure 4.8(e) at 540 (3d ed. 2007). [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Schachtman
Pennsylvania Eng’g Corp., 102 F.3d 194, 198 (5th Cir.1996); Henricksen v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm by Florian Mueller
Avanci et al., United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case no. 20-11032: April 20, 2022 "Brief of Amici Curiae ACT | The App Association, Computer and Communication[s] Industry Association, High Tech Inventor[s] Alliance, and Public Interest Patent Law Institute in support of petition for interference en banc" (I haven't mentioned Perkins Coie before, but I know and respect former as well as current Perkins partners)Google… [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
Given the composition of this working group, no one was surprised by its finding: “The Working Group noted that a causal association between exposure to asbestos and cancer of the ovary was clearly established, based on five strongly positive cohort mortality studies of women with heavy occupational exposure to asbestos (Acheson et al., 1982; Wignall & Fox, 1982; Germani et al., 1999; Berry et al., 2000; Magnani et… [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Mitchell Scruggs, et al, 459 F.3d 1328 (Fed. [read post]