Search for: "S. Y. A.C."
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Alexander Y. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Connie Oxford is Assistant Professor of Gender and Women’s Studies at the State University of New York, Plattsburgh. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:50 am
Y A..., agent de domiciliation de la société C.... [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Pribetic to help me and Letters Blogatory readers get a grip on the Canadian law that will be at issue in the new Ontario case, and I’m delighted he’s agreed. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
”) Below, I have updated once again the case law on the issue of using relative and attributable risks to satisfy plaintiff’s burden of showing, more likely than not, that an exposure or condition caused a plaintiff’s disease or injury. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
A.c. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Again, this assumption is often either pretermitted for purposes of lodging a dispositive motion, conceded, or included as part of the challenge to an expert witness’s opinion’s admissibility. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728, a parent company has a duty of care when: (1) “the harm complained of is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the alleged breach; (2) there is sufficient proximity between the parties that it would not be unjust or unfair to impose a duty of care on the defendants; and, (3) there exist no policy reasons to negate or otherwise restrict that duty. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728, a parent company has a duty of care when: (1) “the harm complained of is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the alleged breach; (2) there is sufficient proximity between the parties that it would not be unjust or unfair to impose a duty of care on the defendants; and, (3) there exist no policy reasons to negate or otherwise restrict that duty. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
John’s Metropolitan Area Bd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1181 [Tock]; St. [read post]