Search for: "S. Y. A.C." Results 61 - 70 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Connie Oxford is Assistant Professor of Gender and Women’s Studies at the State University of New York, Plattsburgh. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
Pribetic to help me and Letters Blogatory readers get a grip on the Canadian law that will be at issue in the new Ontario case, and I’m delighted he’s agreed. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”) Below, I have updated once again the case law on the issue of using relative and attributable risks to satisfy plaintiff’s burden of showing, more likely than not, that an exposure or condition caused a plaintiff’s disease or injury. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Again, this assumption is often either pretermitted for purposes of lodging a dispositive motion, conceded, or included as part of the challenge to an expert witness’s opinion’s admissibility. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728, a parent company has a duty of care when: (1) “the harm complained of is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the alleged breach; (2) there is sufficient proximity between the parties that it would not be unjust or unfair to impose a duty of care on the defendants; and, (3) there exist no policy reasons to negate or otherwise restrict that duty. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728, a parent company has a duty of care when: (1) “the harm complained of is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the alleged breach; (2) there is sufficient proximity between the parties that it would not be unjust or unfair to impose a duty of care on the defendants; and, (3) there exist no policy reasons to negate or otherwise restrict that duty. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
John’s Metropolitan Area Bd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1181 [Tock]; St. [read post]