Search for: "SCOTUS RULING" Results 61 - 80 of 6,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 11:28 am by Ashley Belanger
Enlarge (credit: Larry Crain | iStock / Getty Images Plus) There are some circumstances where government officials are allowed to block people from commenting on their social media pages, the Supreme Court ruled Friday. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:46 am by Rick Hasen
The post SCOTUS Justices disagree on the meaning of the word “and,” on application of the rule of lenity, and on the rule on superfluidities. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:42 am by Ellena Erskine
Tribe, The Atlantic) Are the Justices Still Party Players (Adam Feldman, Empirical SCOTUS) The Supreme Court seems bitterly divided. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:10 am by Rick Garnett
  Although this has been a major political firestorm for the last couple of years, SCOTUS has largely stayed out of the fray. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am by Alex Phipps
Georgia (SCOTUS) appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Unknown
The ruling also created a new circuit split as to whether a plaintiff’s expert opinion can alone satisfy the falsity element of a securities fraud action (NVIDIA Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 10:04 am by Eric Goldman
This highlights the stakes of this and the other cases on their way to SCOTUS: do the foundational Constitutional law principles that have fostered the Internet’s success over the past 25+ years still apply, or have the rules since changed and opened the door to rampant government censorship? [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:28 am by Guest Author
§ 2401(a) when an agency issues a rule or when the rule first causes harm to the plaintiff. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am by Eric Segall
The 14th Amendment lays out new rules for what the states cannot do and a new rule about who is disqualified from holding another office. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by CAFE
In this excerpt from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance break down the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling that states cannot disqualify former President Donald Trump from the ballot for his role in the January 6 insurrection and seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.In the full episode, Preet and Joyce further discuss the Supreme Court’s decision, including Justice Clarence Thomas’s decision not to recuse himself from the… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:38 am by Rick Hasen
The decision ignited an intense debate… Continue reading The post “‘They didn’t do it clearly enough’: SCOTUS ruling prompts worries of another Jan. 6 crisis” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 2:26 pm by Tom Smith
The left-leaning Colorado Supreme Court ruled in December that Trump was ineligible to appear on the ballot. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 11:00 am by Josh Blackman
Colorado will hold its primary on Tuesday, so a ruling on the insurrection matter on Monday would be just in time.The post SCOTUS will announce opinions on Monday "on the homepage. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
The letter acknowledges that a working group has already urged rulemaking to amend Rule 144 to address this issue (which CII also supported, but it hasn’t gone anywhere). [read post]