Search for: "SCS Direct, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2022, 10:39 am by News Desk
Retailer and consumer questions about the voluntary recalls should be directed to the Dole Consumer Response Center at 800-356-3111, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 4:30 pm by Bill Marler
Retailer and consumer questions about the voluntary recalls should be directed to the Dole Consumer Response Center at 800-356-3111, Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 3:00pm Pacific Time. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Cox, 9th Circuit 2014http://t.co/s7ILPOp1jg -> Edward Snowden says NSA engages in industrial espionage http://t.co/0p1bw2tq6N -> Korean Air vows to fight against copyright lawsuit http://t.co/b90QuIF7K3 -> Urdu Publishing is Up, But Copyright Problems Persist http://t.co/GAHvRl8Qs0 -> India SC hearing on Google appeal in defamation suit today http://t.co/sdc2A0XAYh -> Case Law, Vidal-Hall v Google, New Year, new tort of misuse of private information http://t.co/YzfdI2wof8… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:03 am by Ad Law Defense
ZonePerfect Nutrition Co., No. 12–2907–SC, 2014 WL 580696, *56 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:03 am by Ad Law Defense
ZonePerfect Nutrition Co., No. 12–2907–SC, 2014 WL 580696, *56 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:03 am by DBL Law
Arnsperger, case number 2022-SC-0302-DG, in the Supreme Court of Kentucky. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. et al, case number 2:18-cv-01435 was filed in the United States District Court Central District of California against Guillermo del Toro (the director, producer, and writer), Daniel Kraus (associate producer), Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
{While plaintiff has not mentioned the fact, though it long has been a matter of public record, the Court notes also that his spouse receives pension payments from the Newspaper Guild NY - NY Times pension plan and a pension plan for the benefit of retirees of Random House, Inc.} [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Commonwealth, Ky: SC 2014 http://t.co/EKgu1Wv5B1 -> Direct and contributory copyright infringement for uploading videos to websites Grady v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:42 pm by John Day
Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc., E2013-00727-SC-R11-CV (Tenn Ct. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
     Sierra Club challenged EPA's particulate matter attainment status and redesignation of the Cincinnati-Hamilton metropolitan area to "attainment" status and said the agency had acted illegally with respect to both actions, and it filed a petition for direct appellate review. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether a “prohibited result” under s. 145B Trade Union and Labour Relations Consolidation Act 1992 can only arise in circumstances where direct offers to employees take terms outside the scope of collective bargaining on a permanent basis. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:21 am by Eric Caligiuri
” Absent direct evidence of copying, a plaintiff can establish copying by showing that the defendant had access to the plaintiff’s work and the works are substantially similar. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Murray Hill Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether Lloyd, the respondent, should have been refused permission to serve his representative claim against the appellant out of the jurisdiction (i) because members of the class had not suffered ‘damage’ within the meaning of section 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998; and/or (ii) the respondent was not entitled to bring a representative claim because other members of the class did not have the ‘same interest’ in the claim and were not… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(Plameco) (EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Cease and desist declaration only binding to the parties, not a natural or legal person signing on behalf of one of the parties: Metaco Inc. v. [read post]