Search for: "SEC v. Smart"
Results 61 - 80
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
” Since then, people who are actually smart have debated whether the issue remains live and certworthy or not, and even deployed my favorite Supreme Court put-down, the word “baffling. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
The SEC applied the classic three-prong test enunciated in SEC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:53 pm
The SEC analyzed whether DAO Tokens constituted an “investment contract” under the four part test established by the US Supreme Court in the leading case of SEC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
In applying the “Howey” test (SEC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
In applying the “Howey” test (SEC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
In the following blog post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a comprehensive look that problems involved with making payments in response to a ransomware attack. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:09 pm
That ruling was outlined in Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:02 am
The agency cannot be quietly asphyxiated through the appropriations process as has happened with the SEC and FTC. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:57 am
Scrolling feels natural on a smart phone; not so much for a laptop… Conflict Minerals: IPSA Uncertainty Likely to Carry Over to ’17 Here’s the intro from this note from Elm Sustainability Partners: With the Securities and Exchange Commission’s decision earlier this year to forego an appeal to the US Supreme Court of NAM v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
Dear Democratic Presidential Candidate and Sec. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm
Panel on “fluid,” legacy & heritage marks – @MariaBaratta discussing Macy’s v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:24 am
NAM v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
ACTION NOTICE DATE CLAIM DUE DATE 2015-148 SEC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:18 pm
If you’re with an investment advisor, your investment advisor is being regulated by the SEC. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
I’m now not sure if the court was right in the SEC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
I’m now not sure if the court was right in the SEC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
In a new case decided Wednesday, SEC v. [read post]
