Search for: "SEC v. Thompson"
Results 61 - 80
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
The first, the Thompson Memorandum, was released in 2003, stating as one of its express purposes to place “increased emphasis on and scrutiny of the authenticity of a corporation’s cooperation. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:20 am
Department of Justice filed a criminal complaint against Thompson that provides many of the details surrounding Thompson’s hack of the Capital One data. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:05 pm
Civil Complaint for Investment Fraud - SEC v Goldman, Sachs & Co. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Thompson (Georgetown University), on Thursday, April 5, 2018 Tags: Corporate liability, Exchange Act, Liability standards, Misreporting, Rule 10b-5, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts The Maturing Market for Representation and Warranty Insurance Posted by Ian Boczko and John L. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Penal Code, sec. 21.15). [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:00 am
Gorman of SEC Actions Seventh Circuit Rejects Gartenberg Standard in Adviser Fee Case and Fashions New Test by Thompson Hine Supreme Court to Hear Investment Adviser Fee Case (.pdf) by Sutherland A Fresh Look at Director "Independence": Mutual Fund Fee Litigation and Gartenberg at Twenty-Five (.pdf) by Lyman Johnson 61 Vand. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
See Thompson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Tomko , No. 05-4997 Sentence for tax evasion is confirmed where: 1) the the district court did not commit procedural error at sentencing, as the record shows the district court did not fail to meaningfully consider the 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553(a) factor of general deterrence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant, as the court conducted a thorough analysis of the sec. 3553(a) factors and gave logical reasons for the variance from the sentencing guidelines… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:55 am
Senehi v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:43 pm
A rat dropped from the top of my building falls to the ground, accelerating at 32 ft/sec/sec. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:18 pm
S.L. 2021-138, sec. 18. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
SEC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Title: Arar v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
Lawson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
As outlined in the 1993 Maine Supreme Judicial Court case of Smith v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:42 am
For my thoughts on the issue of associational retaliation see En banc panel of 6th Circuit reverses prior holding in Thompson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:46 pm
Thompson, Olin W. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Brandi Thompson, for Respondent. [read post]
