Search for: "SMITH v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 61 - 80
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 3:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is one of the circuits that has held an intangible item, like information, can be a "thing of value" under this statute, and since the Supreme Court is located within the District of Columbia Circuit, that increases the odds that this would be a chargeable offense. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
In all 50 states and the District of Columbia, presidential electors have been viewed as merely effectuating the will of the jurisdiction’s voters, casting their ballots for the winner of their state or district’s presidential election. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:46 am
Peterson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
If those who govern the District of Columbia decide that the Nation’s Capital should be beautiful as well as sanitary, there is nothing in the Fifth Amendment that stands in the way. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:16 am
The authors surmise that, while the Justice Department would prefer to bring the charges in the District of Columbia, it is questionable whether venue in D.C. is proper. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
E.g., Smith, 442 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
E.g., Smith, 442 U. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 11:40 am
Circuit Court for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:08 am
” “In 2019, Reed Smith began getting anonymous correspondence that seemed like “the musings of a disgruntled person who was following” the Providence v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit voted 2 to 1 in March to throw out the District's law, which prohibits handgun ownership except by active and retired law enforcement officers. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Smith, later consolidated into United States v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Jones's conviction `because of admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device. . . . [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Smith. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:03 am
In Barr v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
The Court relied on two decisions of Sixth Circuit — Smith v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
When Justice Black's paragraph is set out in full, it is hard to miss the Court's emphasis on the remarkable breadth of the injunction and its sense of surprise at the lower court's temerity: "In our judgment the action of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia goes beyond any controversy that might have existed between the complaining companies and the Government officials. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in American Insurance Association v. [read post]
