Search for: "SMITH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES" Results 61 - 80 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
The Court was hearing oral arguments on an appeal by the Physicians Hospitals of America and Texas Spine & Joint Hospital, Lts, for the dismissal of an action they had filed for declaratory and injunctive relief against Kathleen Sebelius, as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to prevent enforcement of Section 6001 of the ACA. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
  Floyd appears to involve another Brady claim from the beleaguered New Orleans District Attorney’s Office, as in Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Sebelius Court: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-2281 September 19, 2011 Judge: Seymour Areas of Law: Contracts, Government & Administrative Law, Native American Law This was the second appeal in litigation arising from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' (HHS) decision not to enter into a self-determination contract with the Southern Ute Indian Tribe (Tribe). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission reduced the classification to "other than serious" under 29 U.S.C. 666, in part because the Secretary failed to present case-specific evidence of possible employee exposure to asbestos. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:28 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  The judgment to be appealed is that of the Court of Appeal Civil Division in Ministry of Defence v AB and others[2010] EWCA Civ 1317 – (Smith and Leveson LJJ and Sir Mark Waller). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm by FDABlog HPM
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to file an amicus brief in the consolidated appeals of Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Cochrane predated the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998, but in McLellan the CA held that the IT scheme was compatible with art.6 of the Convention. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Cochrane predated the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998, but in McLellan the CA held that the IT scheme was compatible with art.6 of the Convention. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Matthew Hill
R (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 760 (Admin) – Read case Part 2 of Matthew Hill’s feature on the duty to investigate deaths under human rights law (read Part I). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
The recent self-disclosure cases had potential penalties ranging from $18,900 to $192,400 for environmental violations that the agency determined caused no serious or actual harm to human health or the environment. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]