Search for: "STATE v ENGLISH"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 7:30 am
On 17 April 2024, the Court of Appeal of the UPC handed down its decision concerning the language of proceedings in the (undoubtedly ground-breaking) case of Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
There is a short English phrase – not suitable for print – but featuring the word “cake” that sums this principle up nicely. [1] When reading this point, the authors were reminded of the decision of Vos J in Fresenius v Carefusion [2011] EWHC 2969 in which it was held that if a patentee consented to the revocation of its patent, it was not appropriate for it to be compelled to… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
Service out pursuant to a contractual agreement In NW Corp Pte Ltd v HK Petroleum Enterprises Cooperation Ltd,[17] the contract between the claimant and defendant, who were Singapore and Hong Kong-incorporated companies respectively, contained this clause: ‘This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the English law [sic]. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in Liu v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ AMA v FTC case from 1980). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:51 pm
As to English’s arguments regarding the indemnity scheme in the contracts, the court found that the interpretation was at least ambiguous enough that summary judgment was inappropriate, stating: While we are not prepared to settle conclusively these interpretation disputes at the summary judgment stage, English’s proffered interpretation is, at the very least. reasonable. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
United States and asked whether I would post on the decision here. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
In Alden v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
More than two decades after the shock of Bush v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
He relies on First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
First English itself proceeded under a state-law cause of action. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm
ZERO MEAT v MEAT ZERO Background On 29 September 2021, CPF Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bart v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Serra v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” Perkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
